Guideline on post to thread ratios
#1
July 23rd, 2009

If you're a long-standing respected user, this doesn't apply to you.  This is an observation that I've made about many users who don't contribute to the forum.

Almost all users should have more posts then threads if they're active regularly.  Most users have several times as many posts as threads.

"Violating" this rule (It's not a rule.) isn't going to lead to getting banned, but it's something we check for when deciding whether bans should be considered or if we're on the fence about issuing a warning or how severe it should be.

In most cases your post to thread ratio should be at least 3:1, meaning that you have twice as many posts as threads. 3:1 is effectively a 2:1 ratio because each thread counts as a post. If you have less than a 3:1 post ratio, it's a sign that you're provocative and not contributing to discussions. Many of the long time users on the forum have ratios of 10:1 and some of them are as high as 40:1.
Reply
#2
October 9th, 2010

What if someone posts threads that contain resources or sources? This would unfairly penalize them if they aren't involved in discussions but still contribute to the forum.
Reply
#3
October 11th, 2010

This isn't a "rule" and the moderators would know that those users are valuable and respected members of the community so they wouldn't be penalized.

This guideline is directed at users who have inflammatory tendencies and lean toward posting threads that will get more views than posts.

The first post of a thread is counted as a post, so every user who has ever commented in a thread will have a post to thread ratio greater than one. Anything under two means the user has posted more threads then posts. I prefer to see at least three but if the user doesn't have a history with the mods then the ratio doesn't matter.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)